← All use casesIllustrative concept · Professor
Professor
Review AI-use summaries while grading
View concise summaries of how a student used governed AI while completing an assignment, alongside the instructor's normal grading workflow.
An early-stage product direction. The interface and scenario below are illustrative, not production screenshots or customer results.
RedAPPLSample workspace
Assignment review
Research proposal
Submission review · Instructor workspace
Context for review · no misconduct score
Why it matters
A concise summary can add context to a student's process.
The assignment policy matters when interpreting AI assistance.
Academic judgment should remain with the instructor.
Designed workflow
How it works
- Open an assignment's review context.
- Read a summary of assistance within the governed workspace.
- Consider that context alongside the submission and normal grading criteria.
Example scenario
Put it in context.
An instructor is reviewing a research proposal.
A sample interaction to explain the intended experience.
- Example request
- Show the kinds of AI assistance used in this assignment's governed workspace.
- Applicable policy
- Brainstorming and concept clarification are permitted.
- Illustrative RedAPPL behavior
- The illustrative summary describes assistance categories alongside the assignment policy; it does not provide a misconduct score.
- Intended next step
- The instructor has additional context for their own review, without an automated judgment.
Bring your university context to the conversation.
Request a demo or discuss how your institution could help shape RedAPPL as a design partner.